Decoding Stone Age Tools: Scientists in Action

Scientists have been experimenting with Stone Age tools to understand how they were used by early humans for different activities. They found that the traces left on the stone edges can reveal the type and intensity of the tasks performed. This can help us learn more about the evolution of woodworking technology and its impact on human culture.

The Stone Age is a broad term that covers the period of human history when stone was the main material used for making tools and weapons. It spans from about 3.3 million years ago to about 3,000 years ago, depending on the region and culture. The Stone Age is divided into three sub-periods: the Paleolithic (Old Stone Age), the Mesolithic (Middle Stone Age), and the Neolithic (New Stone Age).

One of the most important aspects of the Stone Age is the development of woodworking technology, which allowed early humans to craft more complex and sophisticated wooden objects, such as houses, canoes, bows, and wells. Woodworking technology also reflects the cultural and social changes that occurred during the Stone Age, such as the transition from nomadic hunting and gathering to sedentary farming and herding.

But how do we know how early humans used stone tools for woodworking and other activities? How can we tell what kind of tasks they performed with them and how skilled they were? These are some of the questions that scientists have been trying to answer by studying the traces left on stone edges after use.

Methods to use Stone Age Tools

A team of researchers from Tokyo Metropolitan University led by Assistant Professor Akira Iwase decided to take a hands-on approach to study how stone edges were used by early humans. They crafted replica tools that might have been used in the Early Upper Paleolithic age (about 38,000–30,000 years ago) using knapping and grinding techniques that were available at the time. They also attached handles to the stone edges using methods from Irian Jaya to create adzes, axes, and chisels.

The researchers then used the tools for 15 different activities, including tree-felling, hide-processing, and butchering, as well as “non-use” events like carrying them around and trampling them. They examined the edges for both macroscopic and microscopic traces of their history. They found that different activities leave different kinds of marks on the stone, such as fractures, polish, striations, and wear patterns. They also developed criteria to distinguish tools used for wood-felling from other activities based on the combination of macroscopic and microscopic traces.

Results

The researchers found that wood-felling requires a high-impact force that causes distinctive fractures on the stone edge. They also found that wood-felling creates microscopic traces of friction between the stone and wood, such as polish and striations. These traces are different from those caused by other activities, such as hide-processing or butchering, which involve lower-impact forces and softer materials.

The researchers also compared their results with archaeological artifacts from Japan and Australia that date back to Marine Isotope Stage 3 (about 60,000–30,000 years ago). They found that some of these artifacts show similar traces to those produced by wood-felling in their experiments. This suggests that early humans may have used ground stone edges for woodworking at an earlier stage than previously thought.

Discussion on Stone Age Tools

The study by Iwase and his colleagues demonstrates how experimental archaeology can help us understand how early humans used stone tools for different activities. By replicating the tools and techniques of ancient times, they were able to create realistic traces on stone edges that can be compared with archaeological evidence. Their findings provide new insights into the evolution of woodworking technology and its implications for human culture.

However, the study also has some limitations that need to be addressed in future research. For example, the researchers only tested a limited number of activities and materials that may not represent all the possible uses of stone tools in the past. They also did not account for other factors that may affect the formation of traces on stone edges, such as environmental conditions, tool maintenance, or user preferences. Moreover, they did not explore how different types of stone or hafting methods may influence the performance and durability of the tools.

Therefore, more experiments are needed to expand the range of activities and variables tested and to validate the criteria developed by the researchers. Furthermore, more archaeological data are needed to confirm the presence and frequency of wood-felling traces on stone edges from different regions and periods. By combining experimental and archaeological approaches, we can gain a better understanding of how Stone Age tools were used and what they tell us about human history.

Conclusion

Stone tools are among the most durable and abundant artifacts left by early humans. They offer valuable evidence about how they made things, how they lived, and how they evolved over time. By studying the traces left on stone edges after use, we can learn more about the type and intensity of the activities performed by early humans and how they changed over time. This can help us reconstruct the development of woodworking technology and its impact on human culture.

The study by Iwase and his colleagues shows how experimental archaeology can help us create realistic traces on stone edges that can be compared with archaeological evidence. Their findings suggest that early humans may have used ground stone edges for woodworking at an earlier stage than previously thought. However, more experiments and data are needed to confirm and refine their results. By combining experimental and archaeological methods, we can gain a deeper understanding of how Stone Age tools were used and what they mean for human history.

Recent Blog : High-Density Hydrogen Storage: Key to Future Energy Systems